Bank Holiday change will ‘cost calendar builder £200,000’

May 2020 page with 4th ringed in red

Image caption

“Bad May” created opposite one of a May 2020 pages to be replaced

Changing a date of subsequent year’s early May bank holiday will cost one calendar builder about £200,000, it has said.

Last week, a supervision announced a bank holiday, set for Monday 4 May, would be switched to Friday 8 May, to symbol a 75th anniversary of VE Day.

Allan Bertram pronounced as a outcome about 400,000 of a calendars that had already been printed would have to have a May 2020 pages replaced.

The supervision pronounced it had deliberate a unsentimental implications of a move.

But a manager of one calendar builder pronounced it had “probably been a singular many stressful week that we have ever faced in business”.

“We’re totally in agreement with changing a date. Just not changing it with 11 months notice, when you’ve had 74 years to ready for this event,” pronounced Andrew Bennett, handling executive of Hertfordshire-based Allan Bertram.

  • Bank holiday altered to symbol VE Day

It is usually a second time a early May bank holiday has been changed – a initial was in 1995 to symbol a 50th anniversary of VE Day.

On that arise people were given some-more notice, pronounced Mr Bennett. “They announced that in Dec 1993. That was positively fine.

“There was no reason because this preference couldn’t have been finished 18 months ago.”

Media captionAndrew Bennett, handling executive of calendar builder Allan Bertram

As good as contracting additional proxy staff, a group would be operative double shifts to make a required changes, Mr Bennett said. While a calendars were creatively fabricated by a machine, a routine of swapping a particular pages for updated ones will have to be finished manually.

Despite a cost, he pronounced promulgation them out with a wrong date would have been too deleterious for a company’s brand.

“Our clients design a product to be right. The easy thing to do would have been to do nothing, or put a plaque on it, though if we wish to concentration on quality, we have to scold a problem.”

The British Printing Industry Federation, that represents about 1,300 copy businesses, pronounced while it welcomed a decoration of VE day, it too believed a supervision should have consulted with groups that would be influenced by a change.

“A series of members will remove income due to calendars and diaries for 2020 being printed already,” pronounced handling executive Dale Wallis.

“It is my bargain that there is no event for compensation. This could means critical income upsurge issues, and therefore other issues for those businesses affected.”

Image caption

400,000 calendars that have already been printed are watchful to be changed

A orator for a Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy pronounced it had “considered a unsentimental implications of relocating this bank holiday”.

Allan Bertram’s Andrew Bennett pronounced a supervision should acknowledge a impact of a timing of a preference on businesses like his – and offer remuneration for costs they will incur.

“As a business, we will survive. But it’s not only a income – it’s a vigour on prolongation that will now make this year impossibly hard.”

You can hear these interviews and some-more research by downloading BBC 5 Live’s Wake Up To Money podcast


How has your association been influenced by a bank holiday change? Share your stories. Email

Please embody a hit series if we are peaceful to pronounce to a BBC journalist. You can also hit us in a following ways:

  • WhatsApp: +44 7555 173285
  • Tweet: @BBC_HaveYourSay
  • Send pictures/video to
  • Please review the terms of use and remoteness policy