Brexit: EU leaders criticize UK proposals

EU arch adjudicator Michel Barnier (r) sat with a President of a European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker (l)Image copyright
Reuters

Image caption

EU arch adjudicator Michel Barnier (r) sat with President of a European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker

EU leaders have pulled detached a UK’s Brexit proposals, accusing Boris Johnson of putting brazen untested ideas to solve a Irish limit crisis.

Chief adjudicator Michel Barnier pronounced a EU indispensable applicable solutions “today not tomorrow”.

European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker told MEPs that while he would “not exclude” a understanding in a entrance days, swell had been limited.

Mr Johnson has pronounced he stays “cautiously optimistic” about a deal.

He will accommodate his Irish counterpart, Leo Varadkar, on Thursday to try and mangle a deadlock, while stability to insist a UK will leave on 31 Oct with or though an agreement.

In Westminster, meanwhile, a organisation of Conservative MPs has been perfectionist assurances from a PM that he will not take a celebration into a subsequent ubiquitous choosing – whenever it comes – on a candid guarantee to leave with no deal.

And earlier, it emerged MPs would be called to Parliament for a special Saturday sitting on 19 Oct – a day after a break EU summit, that is seen as a final possibility for a understanding brazen of a Halloween deadline.

  • Could no-deal still happen?
  • Deal by deadline unequivocally formidable – Irish PM
  • Kuenssberg: Will ‘Super Saturday’ be a wilful Brexit moment?
  • Adler: The finish for negotiations in Brussels?

The UK put brazen uninformed proposals for a Brexit understanding final week, though so distant a greeting from a EU has not been encouraging.

Updating MEPs on a state of talks, Mr Barnier pronounced he believed “with goodwill” on both sides there could be an agreement in a run-up to a summit.

But he pronounced “to put things unequivocally honestly and to try to be objective, we are not unequivocally in a position where we are means to find an agreement”.

As it stood, he said, a UK was proposing replacing an “operable, unsentimental and authorised solution” to equivocate a tough Irish limit with “one that is simply a proxy solution”.

Media captionConfused by Brexit jargon? Reality Check unpacks a basics

Mr Barnier pronounced a UK’s suggested choice to a Irish uphold – that would see etiquette checks conducted divided from a limit during business premises or electronically – “had not been tested” and was “largely based” on exemptions for tiny businesses and record that “has nonetheless to be developed”.

“We need operational genuine controls, convincing controls, we are articulate about a credit of a singular marketplace here – a credulity to consumers, to companies, and to third counties that we have agreements with.”

  • Brexit understanding radically unfit – No 10 source
  • Where are a Brexit talks during right now?
  • What is in Boris Johnson’s plan?
  • The limit restraint Brexit

Mr Barnier also questioned a viability of a UK’s proposals to give a Northern Ireland Assembly a halt over either it aligned with EU singular marketplace manners for products from 2021 onwards and either to separate from them in a future.

However, he did endorse a dual sides were looking during “a some-more critical role” for a Northern Irish domestic institutions.

Merkel call

Under Mr Johnson’s proposals, that he calls a “broad alighting zone” for a new understanding with a EU:

  • Northern Ireland would leave a EU’s etiquette kinship alongside a rest of a UK, during a start of 2021
  • But Northern Ireland would continue to ask EU legislation relating to rural and other products, if a Northern Ireland Assembly approves
  • This arrangement could, in theory, continue indefinitely, though a determine of Northern Ireland’s politicians would have to be sought each 4 years
  • Customs checks on products traded between a UK and EU would be “decentralised”, with usually a “very tiny number” of earthy checks

Mr Juncker, meanwhile, took a appropriate during a UK in a arise of a domestic quarrel over a sum of Tuesday’s phone call between Mr Johnson and German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

Following a call, a No 10 source claimed a German personality had pronounced a understanding formed on a UK’s proposals was “overwhelmingly unlikely” and done new final that done an agreement “essentially impossible”.

“We sojourn in contention with a UK,” Mr Juncker said. “Personally we don’t bar a deal. we do not accept this censure diversion that started in London.”

‘Insulted’

During a infrequently nasty discuss in a European Parliament, former Belgian primary apportion Guy Verhofstadt, indicted Mr Johnson of treating those seeking to forestall a no-deal Brexit as “traitors, collaborators and surrenderers”.

“The reason this is function is unequivocally simple. It is a censure game. A censure diversion opposite everybody – opposite a EU, opposite Ireland, opposite Mrs Merkel, opposite a British legal system, opposite Labour, opposite a Lib Dems, even opposite Mrs May,” he said.

“The usually chairman who is not being blamed is Mr Johnson apparently. All a rest are partial of a problem.”

Image copyright
AFP

Image caption

The supervision has pronounced there will be few earthy etiquette checks

Lib Dem MEP Jane Brophy urged a EU to give a UK as prolonged an prolongation as probable to concede time for a ubiquitous choosing and a referendum.

But Brexit Party personality Nigel Farage suggested Brussels was no longer negotiating in “good faith” and a UK was fed adult with being “talked down to and insulted” by EU leaders.

“You are not looking for solutions. You are looking to put obstacles in a way.”

No-deal disquiet

Mr Farage also suggested a no-deal Brexit would be a “winning ticket” during a destiny ubiquitous choosing – a awaiting that has reportedly caused some fluster among Conservative MPs.

At a assembly on Wednesday afternoon with a organisation of One Nation Tories – led by ex-minister Damian Green – a PM was told that dozens of his MPs would not be peaceful to support a candid declaration guarantee to leave though a understanding if there was a snap choosing before a finish of a year.

Mr Johnson sought to encourage them he was still unequivocally most focused on removing a deal.

But a BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg pronounced while no preference had been taken, she accepted a destiny declaration could embody a guarantee to leave with an agreement if possible, alongside a vouch to leave anyway “within days or weeks” if a Tories won a Commons infancy and there was no possibility of a deal.

The primary apportion has pronounced he is dynamic a UK will leave a EU on 31 October, notwithstanding legislation, famous as a Benn Act, that requires him to write to Brussels requesting a serve check if a understanding is not sealed off by Parliament by 19 Oct – or unless MPs determine to a no-deal Brexit.

Scottish judges motionless on Wednesday to check a preference on either to pointer a minute if Mr Johnson refused to do so, observant instead they would wait until a domestic discuss had “played out”.

  • What is a no-deal exit?

Elsewhere, there was annoy among some Brexiteers after European Parliament President David Sassoli met Commons Speaker John Bercow in London.

A matter after a assembly from Mr Sassoli pronounced they both “fully concluded on a critical purpose that a parliaments play in a Brexit process” and a European establishment would support any ask from a UK for an extension.

Mr Farage pronounced it was “disgraceful” a span had “agreed to work to forestall a no-deal Brexit”.

Conservative MP Marcus Fysh pronounced it was “so distant over his (Mr Bercow’s) inherent role” and indicted him of “colluding with a unfamiliar power”.